29 Dec 2014 | From the Director General

Time for Third Generation reforms in forest management

Message from the Director General

Time for Third Generation reforms in forest management
ICIMOD’s Director General Dr David Molden’s Statement at the
International Symposium on Transforming Mountain Forestry in Dehradun, India

The International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) stands for mountains and people, and therefore we clearly understand the importance forestry plays in our work, and what it means for the livelihood of the people in the region. The many valuable ecosystem services provided by mountain forests, including climate stabilization, carbon sinks, protection of hydro-ecological functions and biodiversity conservation desperately need greater attention.

David James Molden

5 mins Read

Frequently, from all across the Hindu Kush Himalayas, we hear disturbing stories of forest fires, devastating floods, drying springs, loss of biodiversity, spread of invasive species, and increasing human-wildlife conflicts. These are clear indicators that mountains are becoming hotspots of ‘ecological instability’ and such instability will only aggravate if we persist with our business-as-usual actions. Does this mean we have a mountain forestry crisis on our hands? Or is it a crisis of forest management?

The HKH region is marked by change. There is a continuous outmigration of people, especially men, because there is an earnest desire to move beyond subsistence; people are becoming more educated, and find less opportunity to apply their learning in mountains; information technology is providing people with faster and more comprehensive access to information and speeding up globalization processes; and market forces are playing an increasing role in once isolated mountain valleys.

Given this context of change, it is therefore time for a shift in paradigm in the way mountain forests are maintained and managed. It is time for a third generation of forest management that takes into account the changing nature of the Himalayas and the changing aspirations of people dependent on forests.

We have already gone through two paradigms: the first marked by state control of forests, and a second, involving more community and more participatory approaches. What are the key ingredients of the third generation of forest management?

Holistic and integrated approaches are required recognizing that forests cannot be looked at in isolation. For example, there are forest-water interactions critical for communities and people downstream; the way people use forests has implications for energy, water, and for agriculture downstream, and there is an important role for commercial benefits.

The third generation of forest management must take long- and short-term perspectives. We know that many benefits from forests are derived after several generations, and forest conservation ideals are already imbedded in our first and second generation of forest management. In addition, a short-term perspective would take in account more immediate benefits to people, especially those living in poverty on the fringes of development.

To reach the third generation, we have to cross boundaries to move forestry management to another level. There are many types of boundaries to cross: between governments and communities; between foresters and social science; and between sectors like energy, water, agriculture, private sector and forestry.

One way to cross boundaries is the landscape approach, where we look at the interaction of forests with other sectors. The landscape is an appropriate unit of management that takes into consideration the interaction between forests, villages and towns, agricultural lands and rangelands, wetlands and roads, and where individuals, communities, government agencies, and private sector players interact. We use this approach now at ICIMOD to integrate our work. But it does require institutional mechanisms that cross different sectors.

We have to cross boundaries between countries. At this meeting today, there are seven regional member countries of ICIMOD represented. This is a remarkable opportunity to share knowledge and experiences across national boundaries. We recognize that there are many success stories in forestry about community mobilization or the use of technologies within our countries. Let us use this opportunity to come together as a regional forestry community and to learn from each other, and keep this group together as we move forward.

In addition, there are a range of transboundary issues related to forests and Natural Resources Management that have to be considered for third generation forest management. Forests, plants, and animals do not recognize boundaries, and we have to work together across countries to best manage our forest and natural resources.

In the context of climate change and the consequent emission-reduction impasse, there lies an opportunity to view mountain forests as potential long-term carbon sinks even as they continue to provide vital ecosystem services. What is important for the forest-mountain communities is to raise their voice about forest issues in global processes like the UNFCCC. And let us really redouble our efforts to make REDD+ a reality.

This Symposium is an important milestone where we can assess current management practices in mountain forestry, the direction and quality of science, and key forest sector-related policies. This will bring forth the much desired shift in the approaches to counter challenges of epic proportions in the Himalayas. This Symposium aims to create an interactive knowledge sharing platform for developing and adopting innovating approaches to make third-generation reforms a reality.

I am happy to include 10 key messages from Dr Eklabya Sharma, Director Programme Operation of ICIMOD, during the conference in the quest for transforming mountain forests for the third generation paradigm.

People and forests are intrinsically inseparable and must be taken together while designing programmes, policies, and plans.
The key issue is resource governance for regulated use where the local and national institutions have important roles to play. Enhanced capacities of the institutions are vital to meet the new challenges of the transformation.
The Hindu Kush Himalayas (HKH) is a treasure trove of natural capital, cultural heritage, and ethnic diversity, and the enormous ecosystem goods and services the mountains provide need to be sustained. Therefore, addressing degradation and deforestation has never been more urgent.
Degradation and deforestation issues are multi-pronged and so must the answers be. We should try to achieve multi-functionality of landscapes by maintaining a mixture of both old (old growth forests) and new forest structures (plantations and managed forests). This would not only help in soil fertility and retention, but would also keep the springs alive.
The changes happening at both local and macro levels and the drivers of these changes must be holistically understood; and to tackle this, all three pillars of development – social, environmental, and economic – need to be integrated.
Transboundary learning (both geographical and disciplinary), knowledge and data sharing, and cooperation are critical in achieving the third generation paradigm. Further, learning from best practices in the region, for example, community forestry in Nepal could be up-scaled in the neighboring countries. Forests are important carbon sinks and both their stocks and sequestration abilities are vital, therefore, young and old forests should be balanced in a landscape.
Benefit sharing mechanisms for communities have to be practiced to stop degradation. Some of these mechanisms can be established through Payment of Ecosystem Services on hydropower, non-state forest certification involving all stakeholders in the value chain, and implementation of access and benefit sharing mechanisms under the Nagoya Protocol of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Other non-land based employment opportunities such as ecotourism could also be used for preserving biodiversity hotspots and pristine forests against degradation.
The most challenging drivers of forest degradation is cross-border illegal trade of resources and logging which need immediate regional attention. Other issues that must be addressed urgently are conflicts, forest protection, poaching, human-wildlife tensions, and cross-border concerns.
Transboundary cooperation on mountain forestry should be supplemented by efforts to address transboundary issues supported by complementary policies across the countries.
Forests and mountains should be well reflected in Sustainable Development Goals. This is what the symposium participants and the eight regional member countries of the HKH should advocate in 2015 and beyond.

David James Molden

Continue exploring this topic

27 Dec 2016 From the Director General

Celebrating International Mountain Day 2016

Our relationship to mountain communities through our work is reciprocal. As much as we aspire to produce research that enhances ...

11 Dec 2018 From the Director General

International Mountain Day 2018: Mountains Matter!

This year’s theme for International Mountain Day reminds us that mountains matter. They matter for water, but glaciers are retreating and ...

11 Dec 2023 China

2023年国际山岳日：恢复山地生态系统

山地被广泛认为是生物多样性的发源地，其陡峭的斜坡孕育了各种繁复的生命形式。这些地区作为自然的庇护所变得愈发重要：虽然它们只占据了地球总面积的四分之一，却容纳了地球上85%的两栖动物、鸟类和哺乳动物。这种丰富的自然资源在联合国教科文组织的738个全球生物圈保护区中得到体现，其中明显超过一半位于山区。然而，令人担忧的是，这些自然资源的非凡丰富正面临威胁。过去，由于偏远或地形困难，山地得以免受人类干扰，但如今这种状况逐渐减少。曾经被视为大自然摇篮和避难所的山地正在逐渐转变成墓地。在兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区，上个世纪就已经失去了70%的生物多样性。这些损失，包括物种的灭绝，如今正以加速度增长，正如ICIMOD的重要评估报告《兴都库什喜马拉雅的水、冰、社会和生态系统》（简称《HIWISE报告》）所指出的那样。在公众、政治和外交层面，人们越来越认识到自然是我们当前危机中最重要的解决方案之一。联合国已宣布2021-2030年为生态系统恢复十年，去年，《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》的指导下，全球100多个政府承诺在2030年之前将30%的陆地和海洋保留给自然，其中包括兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区。今年，在联合国全球气候大会COP28上，自然首次成为讨论的核心议题。这些努力，以及今年国际山岳日的“生态系统恢复”主题，为恢复和保护山区景观提供了迫切需要的推动力。那么，我们的八个成员国离实现“30x30”目标有多近呢？到目前为止，不丹是唯一一个实际超额达标的国家，其51.4%的土地面积已经属于各种保护区类别。尼泊尔只有不到24%的土地受到保护；中国仅为16%，略高于目标的一半；巴基斯坦占12%；印度为8%；缅甸为7%；孟加拉国为5%，阿富汗为4%。令人担忧的是，在整个兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区，自然资源仍然丰富的关键区域仍处在保护之外：67%的生态区、39%的生物多样性热点、69%的关键生物多样性区域以及76%的重要鸟类和生物多样性区都没有得到保护。现有的保护区域犹如在人类改变过的景观中的“孤岛”，缺乏与其他保护区域的连通走廊，无法满足广泛分布的物种需求，并且面临非法捕猎、侵占和资源开采的压力。现有的保护区域不足以确保成功保护我们地区的象征性物种，包括亚洲象、独角犀牛和孟加拉虎。一个尚未尝试的解决方案是建立跨界生物圈保护区，这将允许在景观层面进行综合保护。实现这一目标需要跨越国家边界的共同政治承诺，并在共享生态系统的管理方面展开合作。ICIMOD将积极推动我们区域成员国接受这一解决方案。然而，底线是，要扭转自然的损失，我们必须对其进行估值并提供相应的资金支持。只要经济学家继续将其价值定为零，就不会引起足够的重视。在进行估值之前，拥有大量自然资本但经济欠发达的国家将因为缺乏3A信用评级而难以以较低贷款利率借款。必须为该地区的国家提供更便宜的资本来促使自然的恢复：这是ICIMOD将与我们的成员、多边开发银行和其他机构紧急合作推进的事项。为了防止地球系统完全崩溃，我们必须为大自然提供一个适宜的生存环境，这一观点从未像现在这样显而易见。

22 Mar 2021 From the Director General

Time for Third Generation reforms in forest management

Stay current

Continue exploring this topic