Back to news

The Hindu Kush Himalaya need institutions for better cooperation

Himalayan countries can look to the Arctic Council, Alpine Convention and the Carpathian Convention to build multilateral cooperation mechanisms, advises the director-general of ICIMOD

Pema Gyamtsho

7 mins Read

70% Complete
Photo: Jitendra Raj Bajracharya/ICIMOD

As environmental pressures grow across the HKH region, it has never been more important that progress on a multilateral cooperation mechanism continues. On 15 October 2020, representatives from all eight governments of the Hindu Kush Himalaya (HKH) signed a declaration at the Ministerial Mountain Summit. All ministers accepted individual country-level and common priorities to sustain mountain environments and improve livelihoods in a HKH Call to Action document. These priorities were generated from a series of dialogues held in each of the eight HKH countries, which drew on science from the 2019 Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment report and sought to link to policies both in the individual countries and those that would be regionally appropriate.

In their October 2020 declaration, the ministers agreed “to constitute a Task Force with high-level representation from the eight HKH countries to assess the feasibility of establishing a regional institutional mechanism. The Task Force should assess similar regional collaborative platforms/institutions from different parts of the world and recommend a feasible configuration for the HKH region in a report to be submitted to the next HKH Ministerial Summit.” The next meeting is due to take place in May next year.

The task force was set up and has met six times. It has started to assess the feasibility of establishing a regional institutional mechanism, which will be captured in a draft recommendation report. The task force members also visited the Permanent Secretariat of the Alpine Convention and the Secretariat of the Carpathian Convention in mid-2022 to learn about other multilateral cooperation mechanisms and their administrative processes and logistical matters.

Urgent need for transboundary cooperation in the HKH

The effects of climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution across the HKH region are not contained within countries’ political boundaries but are transboundary in nature. For the region to reverse or even absorb the impacts of these crises, it is imperative to shift from national perspectives to broader thinking that encompasses eco-regions and is transboundary. The challenges faced by the countries of the HKH are common in nature and common approaches are therefore required to address them.


Explained: The planetary crisis and the Hindu Kush HimalayasThe Hindu Kush Himalaya

(HKH) is the highest mountain system in the world, hosting a high-density population and extending 3,500 km over all or part of eight countries from Afghanistan in the west to Myanmar in the east. Mountains are unique geographies due to their upstream-downstream interconnectedness: the rivers originating from HKH high-altitude glaciers support the lives and livelihoods of nearly two billion people on the floodplains. An incredible diversity of flora and fauna adds to the beauty of these majestic mountain ranges as well as providing a range of ecosystems services.

The triple planetary crises – climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution – are amplified in this region with clear visible impacts. The 2019 publication of the Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment report synthesised up-to-date science on the region across topics such as water availability, air pollution, disasters, glaciers and poverty. An overarching concern highlighted by the report is the vulnerability of the HKH region to climate change. A global temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels will mean an additional increase of 0.3-0.7C in the HKH. Meanwhile habitat loss and mass extinction of endemic species is leading to biodiversity loss, and pollution is threatening human populations’ health and well-being.

Disasters like riverine and glacial lake outburst floods have transboundary implications, for example. Regional cooperation can be instrumental in reducing the negative impacts. Small-scale bilateral cooperation specifically aimed at flood risk reduction is underway in places like the Ratu River, which flows between Nepal and India. But in the face of increasing extreme weather events projected as the climate changes these efforts are too scattered and ad hoc.

Transboundary cooperation in sectors like renewable energy will provide valuable economic resources for individual countries while also reducing carbon emissions and lowering air pollution across the region. For instance, one study found that hydropower investment in a South Asian transboundary river basin is projected to yield benefits that are 30 times the cost. In transport, trade, tourism and infrastructure countries in the region can develop upstream-downstream linkages and maximise the collective benefits from sustainable development.

As all HKH countries are currently prioritising infrastructure development, this is a key moment to consider the benefits of regionally coordinated planning and development for cost-effectiveness and sustainability. Huge investments in downstream countries are at risk from climate-induced and natural disasters, making coordinated upstream-downstream cooperation in risk reduction and benefit-sharing vital.


Look to mechanisms set up by other mountain regions

As we consider how to scale up regional cooperation, there is much to learn from ongoing multilateral cooperation mechanisms established by mountain countries in other parts of the world such as in the Alps, Carpathians and the Arctic.

The Arctic Council, the Alpine Convention – both consisting of eight countries, like the HKH – and the Carpathian Convention are examples of effective regional cooperation mechanisms and are models the HKH could draw on. These institutional mechanisms were explicitly established to enable increased cooperation on environmental protection and sustainable development.

The Alpine Convention was the result of more than four decades of work. The Carpathian Convention received significant help from the UN Environment Programme and Alpine Convention in forming its own regional institutional mechanism. The Arctic Council follows similar processes and was formed on the basis of the Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy.

The Alpine and the Carpathian conventions are legally binding and are guided by framework conventions. The parties have signed multiple protocols on issues related to environmental and cultural protection, sustainable development, and transport management, among others. On the other hand, the Arctic Council is non-binding and is guided by a declaration signed by the parties. It has agreements and strategies focused on protection of the Arctic environment and its indigenous communities; conservation of the Arctic marine environment; and emergency prevention, preparedness and response.

These institutional mechanisms have facilitated cooperation between countries on environmental protection, cultural and natural heritage conservation, sustainable development, and climate change mitigation and adaptation, providing formal mechanisms through which the regions’ voices are unified and strengthened on the global stage. The HKH region can define its own institutional structure and mandates to suit countries’ needs.


Unity needed in the build-up to COP27

The urgency of environmental issues in the HKH region is evidenced by disasters such as the recent floods in Pakistan and the 2017/18 floods in Nepal and India that killed hundreds of people, as well as ongoing problems such as air pollution, erratic rainfall, heatwaves, and environmental degradation.

The HKH region is not equipped with financial and technical resources to overcome these impacts and bounce back. The total cost of climate mitigation for six HKH countries – Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal and Pakistan – is estimated at USD 1,085 billion, while the estimated cumulative cost of adaptation is USD 270 billion, as outlined in countries’ Nationally Determined Contributions. Regional experts have long been calling for global support and collaboration in technical exchange, knowledge generation and financial investments to increase the resilience of the HKH region. A broad regional framework of cooperation that identifies specific opportunities at this moment of development in the region would be an encouraging signal to governments and institutional investors to identify the best opportunities for engagement.

“Mountains as a specific geography have not gained the traction they warrant, in contrast to the unified voice of the Small Islands Developing States”

Through global frameworks such as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) – to which all the countries of the HKH are parties – the benefits of global cooperation are clear, but mountains as a specific geography have not gained the traction they warrant. In contrast, the unified voice of the Small Islands Developing States, through an alliance in the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties (COP), has resulted in conducive policy formulation and strengthened their collective negotiation.

As the countries in the HKH region prepare for this year’s UNFCCC and CBD COPs, a regional and unified approach would attract global attention and climate finance, helping the region manage its responses to the triple planetary crises we face with the urgency and scope required.

This work is part of a collaborative editorial series between the World Bank, ICIMOD and The Third Pole that brings together climate experts and regional voices on “Regional Cooperation for Climate Resilience in South Asia”. The views and opinions expressed by the author are their own. The series has been funded by the United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office through the Program for Asia Resilience to Climate Change – a trust fund administered by the World Bank.

This message was originally published on The Third Pole ( as part of a collaboration editorial series between the World Bank, ICIMOD and The Third Pole that brings together climate experts and regional voices on “Regional Cooperation for Climate Resilience in South Asia”. 


Stay current

Stay up to date on what’s happening around the HKH with our most recent publications and find out how you can help by subscribing to our mailing list.

Sign Up
Time for Third Generation reforms in forest management

Frequently, from all across the Hindu Kush Himalayas, we hear disturbing stories of forest fires, devastating floods, drying springs, loss ...

The pandemic’s long shadow

As this news digest reaches you in this first month of 2022 and we while we continue to hope for ...

Accelerating change for sustainable water management in the HKH

As we join the global community in marking World Water Day with the theme ‘Accelerating Change’, we are yet again ...

The fragility of our mountains

February has been an eventful month. It started with a tragedy in Uttarakhand, India, which once again reminded us all ...

Mountains bring us together

Mountains are generally considered to be barriers that isolate and divide. Their formidable physicality presents challenges for development and the ...

8 Mar 2024 IWD

Read in english 显而易见的是,无论从事何种工作,未能克服性别不公不仅在道德上是错误的,而且对行为底线有害。 在我们迫切需要取得进展的领域,以及国际山地综合发展中心(ICIMOD)所涉及的领域,投资于女性尤为关键,包括发展、科学、气候和自然等方面。 根据世界经济论坛发布的最新研究,仅在印度,性别平等就能为国内生产总值增加7700亿美元;而在孟加拉国,这一数字将达到300亿美元。 尽管存在如此明确的经济激励,但兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区的八个国家仍然面临巨大挑战。 在ICIMOD,我们将性别平等作为2030年战略的核心组成部分,全力改变这一状况,并为国家、社区和自然环境带来回报。 在我们的运营中,我们正在充分利用我们的平台,与妇女团体、青年和原住民关系网络建立更紧密的合作关系;我们承诺通过专家团队和活动来鼓励她们发声,并为她们的职业发展和公共演讲提供支持,同时监测和解决性别不平衡的问题。 我们也致力于在招聘、晋升和行政职能方面推动公平,特别关注增强各个员工层面的性别和多样性代表性,尤其是在决策、专业和领导职位上。 性别问题现已贯穿在我们的各类项目中,每个战略小组内都设有相关专家和分析师。 目前,我们的创业工作优先考虑为由女性或主要雇佣女性以及边缘社会群体的企业提供技术支持和财务资源。 此外,考虑到地方政府和国家政府对于制定自然资源管理(NRM)计划的至关重要性,ICIMOD已经举办了培训,以支持制定能够充分利用妇女见解、技能和专业知识的NRM行动计划。 身处同一地区,我们需要更进一步。 研究表明,女性-包括妇女和女孩-首当其冲受到气候危机的影响。气候危机导致流离失所的受害者中有80%是女性。 从2025年开始,每年预计有1200万女孩受气候危机影响,无法完成学业。到2050年,将有多达1.58亿女性陷入贫困,其中2.36亿女性面临更加严重的粮食不安全状况。 这种性别不平等是由于长期存在的资金流动严重不足,以及政策针对性不够所导致的。 在国际性资金支持中,仅有0.01%用于应对气候变化和促进妇女权利的项目。 全球范围内,只要不到2%的国家气候战略考虑到了妇女和女孩的不同处境和需求。 也许,考虑到女性在决策过程中的代表性不足,这并不足为奇。 在 COP27 上,只有 6% 的世界领导人是女性,这一比例在 COP28 上上升了 10% 以上。直到今年早些时候出现强烈反对之后,今年的 COP 主席才在此前全员男性的组织委员会中增加了 ...

World Water Day 2011

The world’s cities are growing at a great rate and urbanisation is increasing. Almost 38% of the growth is represented ...

The Road Ahead

Last December more than 400 experts on climate change and climate change resilience gathered on our campus in Kathmandu to ...