Back to news

Saying farewell

David James Molden

6 mins Read

70% Complete

As I prepare for my departure from my position of Director General, I would like to take this opportunity to reflect on my time at ICIMOD over the last 9 years – the progress made and challenges ahead.  It is difficult to cover everything here, so I’d like to also refer our readers also to a reflective piece I had written with Dr. Eklabya Sharma, who has served ICIMOD in such a dedicated way, most recently as our Deputy Director General. When I came to ICIMOD, I found it a vibrant institute, a growing voice for mountains, and an organization really making a difference for mountain people – something that was a pleasure to build on. Working together with our Board of Governors and ICIMOD’s many stakeholders, one of my first tasks was to lead a process to develop a strategic framework that would address many of the challenges of the HKH: meeting the SDGs, addressing climate change, and addressing regional issues by bringing countries together, and doing this in a way that recognizes the uniqueness of mountains.

While there are always more results to achieve, I am happy to acknowledge that through the hard work of so many colleagues and partners, we get results. Some important ones include: investments from the governments of Nepal and Bhutan in resilient mountain solutions; our work with the World Food Programme of the United Nations on early warning systems for food shortage; and NGOs like SABAH taking up the business of getting high valued mountain products to the market. In these results, we are seeing the impacts of our work in building resilience and poverty. We have made a difference in income for poor people reaching one million people directly and more than 10 million people indirectly through policy and scaling up efforts. We have evidence that even further investments – more than 30 million dollars – have been leveraged based on our work, although that is a very conservative estimate. There is more to be done in this area, and my wish is that Green Climate Fund and other such mechanisms would better engage more regional work and better recognize the critically important role of knowledge and innovation.

Partnerships are an important way that we make influence and outscale our work, and an important means for us to co-create knowledge. With our impressive array of partners, we have developed many effective networks across the region and have long term relations with partners. We estimate that we have 300 staff, and also 300 partners where we have some relationship. The Himalayan University Consortium, for instance includes more than 80 universities, we also have a cryosphere knowledge hub bringing regional and global expertise to the HKH, the Koshi Basin DRR hub, have recently started REEECH, and are expanding our work with the private sector such as developing a hub for mountain entrepreneurs. In our field work across the HKH, we engage a vast number of different mountain communities, and often bring them together for exchanging information. We have facilitated cross border exchanges between communities, and our work to preserve the important yak herding culture in the region stands out as example.

The global recognition of this region is increasing and that is important since the HKH is the pulse of the planet.  What happens here can be felt around the world and when this pulse is healthy, the planet is healthy. We have long held the position that HKH mountains are a global resource and important for water, energy, cultural diversity, natural beauty and biodiversity. Yet we also realize that the HKH remains a distant and less immediate concern for many people around the world. We have sought to shift that perspective, through highlighting the severe climate change and pollution impacts on the HKH mountains and by emphasizing that mountain people themselves contribute minimally to these global problems. Rather, they carry unequal global burdens, face disintegration of their unique cultures and undervaluation of their indigenous knowledge. We have brought attention to the mountains through amplifying these issues on the global stage, whether it is through assessments like IPCC or IPBES, or involvement in global process like UNFCCC or CBD; or through our regional HKH Assessment which has reached scientists, policymakers and citizens across the globe. But we know that the HKH requires much more attention globally, and that we need more investments if the HKH mountains are to become prosperous and are to retain its youth with a range of robust livelihood options.

We realize in this region that more cooperation across countries will lead to bigger positive impact, and the costs of non-cooperation are too high.  We paid a lot of attention to promoting regional cooperation through our regional programmes, by focusing on issues of common concern like climate change, disasters, biodiversity, science, and mountains themselves; and we also avoid more contentious political issues so that we can keep our status as a neutral non-political regional platform. ICIMOD is one of the very few places where countries do come together and take positive action in this region. With representation from governments of all eight of the HKH countries from the very beginning of ICIMOD’s establishment to this day, our Board of Governors is itself also a wonderful example of regional cooperation.

Since I come from a science background myself, I wanted to see ICIMOD generate more scientific knowledge and to make sure this knowledge is used. Our talented staff write articles, which has earned us a seat at the table for many important discussions, including most recently IPCC and IPBES. This has put us in a great position to work at the science-policy-practice interface in a constructive way. I am pleased that now we are involved in policy discussions – with NAP formulations in Nepal, with Niti Ayog in India, or bringing mountains into the agriculture picture in Pakistan and Bangladesh, or ecotourism in Myanmar. In addition, we use the scientific evidence generated with ground-based partners and communities on innovations like mountain resilient agriculture, reviving springs, brick kiln technology, and flood early warning system.

I take pride that we do work across India, China and Nepal in our Kailash landscape, and that we work constructively on the Upper Indus basin crossing India, China, Pakistan and Afghanistan. There are so many examples in our regional programmes where we work across borders and HUC has taken great strides bringing academics together in the region to focus on mountains. The HKH Assessment process brought scientists from across borders together to address important mountain policy issues, and to develop an HKH Call to Action to bring science to practice. Great momentum has been built for the HKH Call to Action and we’re excited about the direction its taking both towards an 8 country science-policy forum for joint evidence-based discussion on mountains and towards a potential platform like an Arctic Council or Alpine Convention for the HKH mountains. I am pleased that our plans for a Ministerial Summit will take place on the 15th of October, and our hope is that will evolve into an important regional platform where important mountain discussions can take place. ICIMOD would be in a position to enrich this platform with our knowledge and practices.

I also take pride in the ways that we’ve been able to focus our work on gender. We’ve learned a lot and made a lot of progress in this area with our strong gender team and putting in place gender action plans looking both inward at the organization, and outward to our work.

Looking forward, we have many challenges – we are now in the COVID-19 age, but the climate crisis has not gone away, and reaching the SDGs has gotten off track. We recently released a policy paper on the impacts of COVID-19.  In the document we recommend actions for recovery and point out that those actions should also enable sustainable mountain development: green jobs around sustainable energy and mountain agriculture and tourism and nature based solutions that value mountain ecosystems and people. I believe that ICIMOD’s role will be even more critical in the years to come. I believe we have charted a good course that can lead us through these difficult times and I am pleased that Dr Pema Gyamtso will take the lead through these times.  With your support, and all of us working together, ICIMOD will make a difference.

Thank you.

Stay current

Stay up to date on what’s happening around the HKH with our most recent publications and find out how you can help by subscribing to our mailing list.

Sign Up
From implementation to impact

The Strategy and Results Framework of 2012 provided direction for ICIMOD, with impact and integration delivered through a set of ...

A flood of challenges

The ICIMOD family has been working from home since March because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Besides the deluge of news ...

Message from the Director General

In the aftermath of the Gorkha Earthquake that hit Nepal on 25 April, ICIMOD joined hands with regional and international ...

Wastewaters of the Third Pole: Challenges and Opportunities in Hindu Kush Himalaya

“Why waste water?” This is the provocative question-slash-theme posed by the United Nations this year in honor of World ...

International Day for Biological Diversity, 22 May 2018

今年是《生物多样性公约》生效第25周年。今年“国际生物多样性 日”庆祝的主题是“生物多样性保护:行动的 25 年”。 在过去的 25 年中,兴都库什喜马拉雅地区各个国家的山区生物多样性保护工作一直受益于 《生物多样性公约》等全球环境治理机制。尽管实现《生物多样性公约》的国家和全球目标仍是 巨大的挑战,对我们来说今年的“国际生物多样性日”是一个承前启后、继往开来的时刻。 兴都库什喜马拉雅地区是 2.4 亿人口的家园,并为占世界四分之一人口的 19 亿人提供水资 源。位于该地区的喜马拉雅、印缅、中国西南山区以及中亚山区历来就是紧密联系的跨境生物多 样性热点地区。这些热点地区为 30 亿人口的生计提供支持并保障他们的粮食安全,而这 30 亿人 口中包含了部分世界上最贫困及弱势的人群。 尊重兴都库什喜马拉雅地区生命的多样性及着眼于人民的福祉一直以来作为核心理念主导着 国际山地综合发展中心的工作,中心跨境景观保护与发展项目的各项行动就是最好的证明。通过 ...

11 Dec 2023 China
2023年国际山岳日:恢复山地生态系统

山地被广泛认为是生物多样性的发源地,其陡峭的斜坡孕育了各种繁复的生命形式。这些地区作为自然的庇护所变得愈发重要:虽然它们只占据了地球总面积的四分之一,却容纳了地球上85%的两栖动物、鸟类和哺乳动物。这种丰富的自然资源在联合国教科文组织的738个全球生物圈保护区中得到体现,其中明显超过一半位于山区。 然而,令人担忧的是,这些自然资源的非凡丰富正面临威胁。过去,由于偏远或地形困难,山地得以免受人类干扰,但如今这种状况逐渐减少。曾经被视为大自然摇篮和避难所的山地正在逐渐转变成墓地。在兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区,上个世纪就已经失去了70%的生物多样性。这些损失,包括物种的灭绝,如今正以加速度增长,正如ICIMOD的重要评估报告《兴都库什喜马拉雅的水、冰、社会和生态系统》(简称《HIWISE报告》)所指出的那样。 在公众、政治和外交层面,人们越来越认识到自然是我们当前危机中最重要的解决方案之一。联合国已宣布2021-2030年为生态系统恢复十年,去年,《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》的指导下,全球100多个政府承诺在2030年之前将30%的陆地和海洋保留给自然,其中包括兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区。今年,在联合国全球气候大会COP28上,自然首次成为讨论的核心议题。 这些努力,以及今年国际山岳日的“生态系统恢复”主题,为恢复和保护山区景观提供了迫切需要的推动力。那么,我们的八个成员国离实现“30x30”目标有多近呢?到目前为止,不丹是唯一一个实际超额达标的国家,其51.4%的土地面积已经属于各种保护区类别。 尼泊尔只有不到24%的土地受到保护;中国仅为16%,略高于目标的一半;巴基斯坦占12%;印度为8%;缅甸为7%;孟加拉国为5%,阿富汗为4%。 令人担忧的是,在整个兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区,自然资源仍然丰富的关键区域仍处在保护之外:67%的生态区、39%的生物多样性热点、69%的关键生物多样性区域以及76%的重要鸟类和生物多样性区都没有得到保护。 现有的保护区域犹如在人类改变过的景观中的“孤岛”,缺乏与其他保护区域的连通走廊,无法满足广泛分布的物种需求,并且面临非法捕猎、侵占和资源开采的压力。现有的保护区域不足以确保成功保护我们地区的象征性物种,包括亚洲象、独角犀牛和孟加拉虎。 一个尚未尝试的解决方案是建立跨界生物圈保护区,这将允许在景观层面进行综合保护。实现这一目标需要跨越国家边界的共同政治承诺,并在共享生态系统的管理方面展开合作。ICIMOD将积极推动我们区域成员国接受这一解决方案。 然而,底线是,要扭转自然的损失,我们必须对其进行估值并提供相应的资金支持。只要经济学家继续将其价值定为零,就不会引起足够的重视。在进行估值之前,拥有大量自然资本但经济欠发达的国家将因为缺乏3A信用评级而难以以较低贷款利率借款。必须为该地区的国家提供更便宜的资本来促使自然的恢复:这是ICIMOD将与我们的成员、多边开发银行和其他机构紧急合作推进的事项。为了防止地球系统完全崩溃,我们必须为大自然提供一个适宜的生存环境,这一观点从未像现在这样显而易见。

Early Warning for All cannot come soon enough for the Hindu Kush Himalaya

The economic price of climate-driven storms, floods, heatwaves and droughts has been calculated for the first time—and found to have ...